Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT upheld the PCIT's exercise of revisionary jurisdiction under s.263, holding that s.263 is available to correct an order erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue even where the error is apparent from the record and potentially rectifiable under s.154 or s.147. The AO's order was found erroneous and prejudicial for disallowing depreciation on goodwill to the extent of Rs.10,89,82,058 as against the claim of Rs.27,63,20,888, and the PCIT's directions under s.263 were sustained. Merits of the depreciation claim (including reliance on judicial precedents) were left to the pending appeal against quantum before the ld. CIT(A). The assessee's appeal is dismissed.
The ITAT upheld the PCIT's exercise of revisionary jurisdiction under s.263, holding that s.263 is available to correct an order erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue even where the error is apparent from the record and potentially rectifiable under s.154 or s.147. The AO's order was found erroneous and prejudicial for disallowing depreciation on goodwill to the extent of Rs.10,89,82,058 as against the claim of Rs.27,63,20,888, and the PCIT's directions under s.263 were sustained. Merits of the depreciation claim (including reliance on judicial precedents) were left to the pending appeal against quantum before the ld. CIT(A). The assessee's appeal is dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
