Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that invocation of section 41(1) against the assessee raised triable issues touching prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable loss, but the impugned addition cannot stand without examination of newly-tendered documentary evidence. The Tribunal restored the matter to the file of the AO for de novo adjudication, directing the AO to verify confirmations of balances, sample purchase invoices and bank statements evidencing subsequent payments, and to afford the assessee a fair opportunity of hearing before passing fresh order in accordance with law. The appeal is disposed of in favour of the assessee for statistical purposes.
ITAT held that invocation of section 41(1) against the assessee raised triable issues touching prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable loss, but the impugned addition cannot stand without examination of newly-tendered documentary evidence. The Tribunal restored the matter to the file of the AO for de novo adjudication, directing the AO to verify confirmations of balances, sample purchase invoices and bank statements evidencing subsequent payments, and to afford the assessee a fair opportunity of hearing before passing fresh order in accordance with law. The appeal is disposed of in favour of the assessee for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.