Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Page of 4824
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
9981 to 10000 of 96463 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT upheld that payments characterized as commission to a non-resident entity under an exclusive procurement and supply agreement do not constitute "fees for technical services" within the meaning of the Act or the India-UK DTAA, as no technical knowledge, skill or transfer was conferred to the taxpayer. Consequently, the Revenue's treatment of such commission as taxable under the fee-for-technical-services paradigm and resultant TDS liability under section 195 was found incorrect. The Tribunal set aside the impugned appellate authority's decision insofar as it upheld that characterization and quashed the corresponding TDS exigibility; the taxpayer's appeals were allowed.
ITAT upheld that payments characterized as commission to a non-resident entity under an exclusive procurement and supply agreement do not constitute "fees for technical services" within the meaning of the Act or the India-UK DTAA, as no technical knowledge, skill or transfer was conferred to the taxpayer. Consequently, the Revenue's treatment of such commission as taxable under the fee-for-technical-services paradigm and resultant TDS liability under section 195 was found incorrect. The Tribunal set aside the impugned appellate authority's decision insofar as it upheld that characterization and quashed the corresponding TDS exigibility; the taxpayer's appeals were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
