Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the appeal and set aside the orders of the lower authorities, directing the AO to delete the impugned addition arising from a downward TP adjustment in respect of global account management charges (GAM). The Tribunal held that the appellant reasonably quantified benefit from services rendered by its associated enterprise and that aggregation and application of TNMM to the GAM charges was appropriate; the TPO erred in excluding GAM for separate benchmarking. On the facts, the GAM payments were inextricably linked to the appellant's core business and could not be segregated for independent benchmarking, resulting in a decision in favour of the appellant.
ITAT allowed the appeal and set aside the orders of the lower authorities, directing the AO to delete the impugned addition arising from a downward TP adjustment in respect of global account management charges (GAM). The Tribunal held that the appellant reasonably quantified benefit from services rendered by its associated enterprise and that aggregation and application of TNMM to the GAM charges was appropriate; the TPO erred in excluding GAM for separate benchmarking. On the facts, the GAM payments were inextricably linked to the appellant's core business and could not be segregated for independent benchmarking, resulting in a decision in favour of the appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.