Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
The HC dismissed the petition without quashing the impugned...
Petition dismissed; petitioner allowed to submit detailed disclosures and documents for re-consideration; notices for 2019-23 may be adjudicated on merits
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The HC dismissed the petition without quashing the impugned notices, granting the petitioner liberty to furnish full details, including copies of state authority orders for 2017-18 and 2018-19 and particulars of pending appeals, for fresh consideration by the Central authorities; those authorities are directed to consider such submissions on their merits and in accordance with law. With respect to the remaining years (2019-20 to 2022-23), the HC held the asserted jurisdictional bar inapplicable and confirmed that the Central authorities are at liberty to adjudicate the notices for those years on merits. The petition is disposed of, subject to the petitioner's compliance with the directed disclosures.
The HC dismissed the petition without quashing the impugned notices, granting the petitioner liberty to furnish full details, including copies of state authority orders for 2017-18 and 2018-19 and particulars of pending appeals, for fresh consideration by the Central authorities; those authorities are directed to consider such submissions on their merits and in accordance with law. With respect to the remaining years (2019-20 to 2022-23), the HC held the asserted jurisdictional bar inapplicable and confirmed that the Central authorities are at liberty to adjudicate the notices for those years on merits. The petition is disposed of, subject to the petitioner's compliance with the directed disclosures.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
