Omitted specified domestic transaction provision invalidates related-party expenditure transfer-pricing references and assessments based on consequent...
Preventive suspension requires an immediate continuing threat and cannot become indefinite without inquiry, fresh evidence, or proportionate safeguard...
The HC quashed the impugned orders rejecting refund claims for unutilized ITC as time-barred, finding that the limitation extension applicable to the statutory window period renders the refund filings within limitation. The petitioner's refund applications are restored to the file of the Proper Officer, who is directed to treat the applications as within limitation and adjudicate them on merits. The Proper Officer must dispose of the restored refund applications in accordance with law expeditiously, and in any event within three months from the date of uploading of this order. The petition is disposed of.
The HC quashed the impugned orders rejecting refund claims for unutilized ITC as time-barred, finding that the limitation extension applicable to the statutory window period renders the refund filings within limitation. The petitioner's refund applications are restored to the file of the Proper Officer, who is directed to treat the applications as within limitation and adjudicate them on merits. The Proper Officer must dispose of the restored refund applications in accordance with law expeditiously, and in any event within three months from the date of uploading of this order. The petition is disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.