Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4381 to 4400 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC affirmed disciplinary liability for the Appellant arising from an employee's collusion with a third-party exporter, misuse of a third-party IEC, submission of misdeclared export consignments and forged/bogus invoices, holding that the employer failed in its duty of supervision and due diligence. Applying the principle of proportionality, the court curtailed permanent revocation and imposed a revocation period of four years, terminating on 21 December 2025. The appeal is disposed. The Customs authority is directed, upon consideration of the Appellant's due diligence submissions, to decide on any renewal of the CHA licence in accordance with law and regulatory requirements.
The HC affirmed disciplinary liability for the Appellant arising from an employee's collusion with a third-party exporter, misuse of a third-party IEC, submission of misdeclared export consignments and forged/bogus invoices, holding that the employer failed in its duty of supervision and due diligence. Applying the principle of proportionality, the court curtailed permanent revocation and imposed a revocation period of four years, terminating on 21 December 2025. The appeal is disposed. The Customs authority is directed, upon consideration of the Appellant's due diligence submissions, to decide on any renewal of the CHA licence in accordance with law and regulatory requirements.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
