Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
HC ordered that the petitioner's refund application be processed and the refundable balance paid with statutory interest within two months. The court noted that an initial refund of Rs.7,71,000 had previously been appropriated/adjusted against outstanding liabilities of Rs.10,71,941 pursuant to an earlier order dated 18 Sept 2023, and that a demand of Rs.12,10,668 was subsequently cancelled and communicated to the GST Commissionerate, Palam. Having considered submissions that the refundable amount is payable to the petitioner, the HC directed the revenue to disburse the refund in accordance with law and disposed of the petition.
HC ordered that the petitioner's refund application be processed and the refundable balance paid with statutory interest within two months. The court noted that an initial refund of Rs.7,71,000 had previously been appropriated/adjusted against outstanding liabilities of Rs.10,71,941 pursuant to an earlier order dated 18 Sept 2023, and that a demand of Rs.12,10,668 was subsequently cancelled and communicated to the GST Commissionerate, Palam. Having considered submissions that the refundable amount is payable to the petitioner, the HC directed the revenue to disburse the refund in accordance with law and disposed of the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
