Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1381 to 1400 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC ordered that the petitioner's refund application be processed and the refundable balance paid with statutory interest within two months. The court noted that an initial refund of Rs.7,71,000 had previously been appropriated/adjusted against outstanding liabilities of Rs.10,71,941 pursuant to an earlier order dated 18 Sept 2023, and that a demand of Rs.12,10,668 was subsequently cancelled and communicated to the GST Commissionerate, Palam. Having considered submissions that the refundable amount is payable to the petitioner, the HC directed the revenue to disburse the refund in accordance with law and disposed of the petition.
HC ordered that the petitioner's refund application be processed and the refundable balance paid with statutory interest within two months. The court noted that an initial refund of Rs.7,71,000 had previously been appropriated/adjusted against outstanding liabilities of Rs.10,71,941 pursuant to an earlier order dated 18 Sept 2023, and that a demand of Rs.12,10,668 was subsequently cancelled and communicated to the GST Commissionerate, Palam. Having considered submissions that the refundable amount is payable to the petitioner, the HC directed the revenue to disburse the refund in accordance with law and disposed of the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
