Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC upheld the appellate authorities' findings, holding that income computed pursuant to an APA executed under s.92CC is binding and, where the assessee voluntarily reported ALP-based adjustments in its return without enhancement by the AO under s.92C, the exemption under s.10AA remains available. The court reiterated that APAs remove valuation uncertainty for international transactions and are binding except in specified circumstances (change of law/facts, fraud/misrepresentation). The HC further held that the AO's adhoc 10% disallowance under s.14A lacked tangible basis; prior administrative acceptance of deletions and absence of prosecutable infirmity meant no substantial question of law arose for the appeals.
The HC upheld the appellate authorities' findings, holding that income computed pursuant to an APA executed under s.92CC is binding and, where the assessee voluntarily reported ALP-based adjustments in its return without enhancement by the AO under s.92C, the exemption under s.10AA remains available. The court reiterated that APAs remove valuation uncertainty for international transactions and are binding except in specified circumstances (change of law/facts, fraud/misrepresentation). The HC further held that the AO's adhoc 10% disallowance under s.14A lacked tangible basis; prior administrative acceptance of deletions and absence of prosecutable infirmity meant no substantial question of law arose for the appeals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.