Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The HC upheld the appellate authorities' findings, holding that income computed pursuant to an APA executed under s.92CC is binding and, where the assessee voluntarily reported ALP-based adjustments in its return without enhancement by the AO under s.92C, the exemption under s.10AA remains available. The court reiterated that APAs remove valuation uncertainty for international transactions and are binding except in specified circumstances (change of law/facts, fraud/misrepresentation). The HC further held that the AO's adhoc 10% disallowance under s.14A lacked tangible basis; prior administrative acceptance of deletions and absence of prosecutable infirmity meant no substantial question of law arose for the appeals.
The HC upheld the appellate authorities' findings, holding that income computed pursuant to an APA executed under s.92CC is binding and, where the assessee voluntarily reported ALP-based adjustments in its return without enhancement by the AO under s.92C, the exemption under s.10AA remains available. The court reiterated that APAs remove valuation uncertainty for international transactions and are binding except in specified circumstances (change of law/facts, fraud/misrepresentation). The HC further held that the AO's adhoc 10% disallowance under s.14A lacked tangible basis; prior administrative acceptance of deletions and absence of prosecutable infirmity meant no substantial question of law arose for the appeals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.