Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT upheld the assessee's benchmarking and held the arm's-length outcome for the bareboat charter hire arrangement with the associated enterprise; the Tribunal found no merit in the TPO/AO's transfer-pricing adjustment of INR 10,47,30,105 and directed its deletion, allowing grounds 4-10 of the assessee's appeal. The Tribunal relied on the consistent facts and prior DRP acceptance in earlier year, noting comparability and that even after imputing a 2.5% commission the assessee's remuneration remained within comparable limits. The Tribunal further directed the jurisdictional AO to compute interest under s.234C of the Act in accordance with "returned income."
ITAT upheld the assessee's benchmarking and held the arm's-length outcome for the bareboat charter hire arrangement with the associated enterprise; the Tribunal found no merit in the TPO/AO's transfer-pricing adjustment of INR 10,47,30,105 and directed its deletion, allowing grounds 4-10 of the assessee's appeal. The Tribunal relied on the consistent facts and prior DRP acceptance in earlier year, noting comparability and that even after imputing a 2.5% commission the assessee's remuneration remained within comparable limits. The Tribunal further directed the jurisdictional AO to compute interest under s.234C of the Act in accordance with "returned income."
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
