Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC allowed the petition by way of remand, directing that the matter be referred to the concerned Adjudicating Authority to determine within three months whether amounts recovered by the petitioner for electricity supply are exigible to service tax under the Finance Act, 1994. The HC declined to adjudicate merits, holding writ jurisdiction under Articles 226/227 does not permit reappreciation of evidence or factual findings and noting the appellate order was not challenged. The court observed the petitioner has made a prima facie showing that charges mirrored those of the distribution company, but bills and records must be examined by the Adjudicating Authority before any tax liability is fixed.
The HC allowed the petition by way of remand, directing that the matter be referred to the concerned Adjudicating Authority to determine within three months whether amounts recovered by the petitioner for electricity supply are exigible to service tax under the Finance Act, 1994. The HC declined to adjudicate merits, holding writ jurisdiction under Articles 226/227 does not permit reappreciation of evidence or factual findings and noting the appellate order was not challenged. The court observed the petitioner has made a prima facie showing that charges mirrored those of the distribution company, but bills and records must be examined by the Adjudicating Authority before any tax liability is fixed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
