All appeals dismissed; finding of anti-competitive bid-rigging upheld under Sections 3(3)(c), 3(3)(d) read with 3(1); cease-and-desist and total-turno...
Central Government notifies 11.541-hectare Special Economic Zone for semiconductor manufacturing; Approval Committee constituted, ICD status effective...
Government appoints National Customs Targeting Centre-Passenger director as customs officer with powers under PNR Regulations, 2022 and Sections 30A, ...
The HC allowed the petition by way of remand, directing that the matter be referred to the concerned Adjudicating Authority to determine within three months whether amounts recovered by the petitioner for electricity supply are exigible to service tax under the Finance Act, 1994. The HC declined to adjudicate merits, holding writ jurisdiction under Articles 226/227 does not permit reappreciation of evidence or factual findings and noting the appellate order was not challenged. The court observed the petitioner has made a prima facie showing that charges mirrored those of the distribution company, but bills and records must be examined by the Adjudicating Authority before any tax liability is fixed.
The HC allowed the petition by way of remand, directing that the matter be referred to the concerned Adjudicating Authority to determine within three months whether amounts recovered by the petitioner for electricity supply are exigible to service tax under the Finance Act, 1994. The HC declined to adjudicate merits, holding writ jurisdiction under Articles 226/227 does not permit reappreciation of evidence or factual findings and noting the appellate order was not challenged. The court observed the petitioner has made a prima facie showing that charges mirrored those of the distribution company, but bills and records must be examined by the Adjudicating Authority before any tax liability is fixed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
