Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10021 to 10040 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT dismissed the revenue's appeal and affirmed the impugned order, thereby dropping the demand for service tax for the post-negative list period 1.7.2012-31.3.2015 in respect of "manpower supply service" allegedly provided by an overseas group entity to its Indian group company. The Tribunal held that the transactions constituted deputation/secondment of employees to execute the overseas principal's own contract and did not amount to supply of manpower by an agency; thus no taxable manpower recruitment or supply service arose. The CESTAT distinguished contrary apex court authority on facts and relied on prior tribunal and HC reasoning; the revenue's challenge was dismissed.
CESTAT dismissed the revenue's appeal and affirmed the impugned order, thereby dropping the demand for service tax for the post-negative list period 1.7.2012-31.3.2015 in respect of "manpower supply service" allegedly provided by an overseas group entity to its Indian group company. The Tribunal held that the transactions constituted deputation/secondment of employees to execute the overseas principal's own contract and did not amount to supply of manpower by an agency; thus no taxable manpower recruitment or supply service arose. The CESTAT distinguished contrary apex court authority on facts and relied on prior tribunal and HC reasoning; the revenue's challenge was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
