Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held the demand confirmed where the petitioner failed to reply to the Notice in Form GST DRC-01 and rejected the rectification application under Section 161 as time-barred and meritless, finding no procedural infirmity in the assessment order. The writ petition was dismissed as filed long after the statutory period for appeal had lapsed. The HC granted limited relief by permitting the petitioner liberty to file the statutory appellate remedy within 30 days from receipt of the order, subject to deposit of 50% of the disputed tax in cash; upon compliance the Deputy Commissioner (GST Appeals) shall entertain and dispose of the appeal notwithstanding limitation. Petition disposed.
HC held the demand confirmed where the petitioner failed to reply to the Notice in Form GST DRC-01 and rejected the rectification application under Section 161 as time-barred and meritless, finding no procedural infirmity in the assessment order. The writ petition was dismissed as filed long after the statutory period for appeal had lapsed. The HC granted limited relief by permitting the petitioner liberty to file the statutory appellate remedy within 30 days from receipt of the order, subject to deposit of 50% of the disputed tax in cash; upon compliance the Deputy Commissioner (GST Appeals) shall entertain and dispose of the appeal notwithstanding limitation. Petition disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
