Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
The HC set aside the impugned order dated 30.06.2025, holding it to be a non-speaking order that violated principles of natural justice by failing to address the petitioner's explanations and objections. The impugned order is to be treated as a show cause notice; the petitioner may file objections with supporting documents within four weeks of receipt of this order. The first respondent/revenue is directed to issue requisite notice, afford an opportunity of hearing, reconsider the matter, and redo the assessment by passing a speaking order addressing the objections, input tax credit and stock variation issues. The petition is disposed of subject to compliance with these directions.
The HC set aside the impugned order dated 30.06.2025, holding it to be a non-speaking order that violated principles of natural justice by failing to address the petitioner's explanations and objections. The impugned order is to be treated as a show cause notice; the petitioner may file objections with supporting documents within four weeks of receipt of this order. The first respondent/revenue is directed to issue requisite notice, afford an opportunity of hearing, reconsider the matter, and redo the assessment by passing a speaking order addressing the objections, input tax credit and stock variation issues. The petition is disposed of subject to compliance with these directions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.