Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC set aside the impugned order dated 30.06.2025, holding it to be a non-speaking order that violated principles of natural justice by failing to address the petitioner's explanations and objections. The impugned order is to be treated as a show cause notice; the petitioner may file objections with supporting documents within four weeks of receipt of this order. The first respondent/revenue is directed to issue requisite notice, afford an opportunity of hearing, reconsider the matter, and redo the assessment by passing a speaking order addressing the objections, input tax credit and stock variation issues. The petition is disposed of subject to compliance with these directions.
The HC set aside the impugned order dated 30.06.2025, holding it to be a non-speaking order that violated principles of natural justice by failing to address the petitioner's explanations and objections. The impugned order is to be treated as a show cause notice; the petitioner may file objections with supporting documents within four weeks of receipt of this order. The first respondent/revenue is directed to issue requisite notice, afford an opportunity of hearing, reconsider the matter, and redo the assessment by passing a speaking order addressing the objections, input tax credit and stock variation issues. The petition is disposed of subject to compliance with these directions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
