Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The HC allowed the writ petition in part and remitted the matter to the original authority (respondent No.2) for fresh adjudication. The court held that the Appellate Authority, under s.107(11), lacked jurisdiction to remit proceedings and could only allow or dismiss the appeal; accordingly the petitioner's production of documents before the Appellate Authority could not substitute for assessment by the original authority. The matter concerns short declaration of tax liability on inverted supplies in GST returns filed in July for FY 2017-18 amid teething issues in the regime. Respondent No.2 is directed to consider the documents tendered, reassess the petitioner's claim and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
The HC allowed the writ petition in part and remitted the matter to the original authority (respondent No.2) for fresh adjudication. The court held that the Appellate Authority, under s.107(11), lacked jurisdiction to remit proceedings and could only allow or dismiss the appeal; accordingly the petitioner's production of documents before the Appellate Authority could not substitute for assessment by the original authority. The matter concerns short declaration of tax liability on inverted supplies in GST returns filed in July for FY 2017-18 amid teething issues in the regime. Respondent No.2 is directed to consider the documents tendered, reassess the petitioner's claim and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
