Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
The HC allowed the petition in part and directed the petitioner to deposit 25% of the disputed tax within four weeks from the date of uploading of the web copy of the order; the court quashed the impugned Order-in-Original concerning short payment of IGST, discrepancies between GSTR-3B and GSTR-1 for April 2020-March 2021, alleged excess availment/utilization of ITC not reflected in GSTR-2A, reverse charge vs. GSTR-3B issues, ineligible ITC attributable to suppliers' non-filing, reversals under Rules 42/43, interest under Section 50, blocked credits under Section 17(5), and late fee under Section 47. The OIO No.31/2025-GST(Supdt.)(R-I) dated 25.02.2025 issued by the 1st respondent is quashed and the petition is disposed of.
The HC allowed the petition in part and directed the petitioner to deposit 25% of the disputed tax within four weeks from the date of uploading of the web copy of the order; the court quashed the impugned Order-in-Original concerning short payment of IGST, discrepancies between GSTR-3B and GSTR-1 for April 2020-March 2021, alleged excess availment/utilization of ITC not reflected in GSTR-2A, reverse charge vs. GSTR-3B issues, ineligible ITC attributable to suppliers' non-filing, reversals under Rules 42/43, interest under Section 50, blocked credits under Section 17(5), and late fee under Section 47. The OIO No.31/2025-GST(Supdt.)(R-I) dated 25.02.2025 issued by the 1st respondent is quashed and the petition is disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
