Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT allowed the appeal, holding that delivery order charges received by the assessee in its air-cargo business are integral to and "directly connected with" international air transportation and therefore fall within Article 8(2)(b) of the applicable tax treaty; such receipts are taxable in the Contracting State and not taxable in India. The Tribunal reversed the lower authorities' additions, accepted the assessee's substantive ground as covered by its earlier decision for the relevant assessment year, and directed deletion of the impugned taxability of delivery order charges in India. The revenue's assessment treating those receipts as Indian taxable income was set aside.
The ITAT allowed the appeal, holding that delivery order charges received by the assessee in its air-cargo business are integral to and "directly connected with" international air transportation and therefore fall within Article 8(2)(b) of the applicable tax treaty; such receipts are taxable in the Contracting State and not taxable in India. The Tribunal reversed the lower authorities' additions, accepted the assessee's substantive ground as covered by its earlier decision for the relevant assessment year, and directed deletion of the impugned taxability of delivery order charges in India. The revenue's assessment treating those receipts as Indian taxable income was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.