Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10021 to 10040 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that the notice issued under s.148 was barred by limitation and the reassessment proceedings were quashed. The Tribunal found the AO lacked books, documents or evidence showing that the alleged escaped income met the twin conditions of s.149(1)(b): (i) income escaping assessment and (ii) such income being represented in the form of an asset; a disallowance of expenditure could not be treated as representation in the form of an asset. The Tribunal treated the post-relevant-date amendment to s.149(1)(b) as having prospective effect. Consequently the s.148 notice dated 23-4-2021 was invalid, reassessment set aside and the assessee's cross-objection ground allowed.
ITAT held that the notice issued under s.148 was barred by limitation and the reassessment proceedings were quashed. The Tribunal found the AO lacked books, documents or evidence showing that the alleged escaped income met the twin conditions of s.149(1)(b): (i) income escaping assessment and (ii) such income being represented in the form of an asset; a disallowance of expenditure could not be treated as representation in the form of an asset. The Tribunal treated the post-relevant-date amendment to s.149(1)(b) as having prospective effect. Consequently the s.148 notice dated 23-4-2021 was invalid, reassessment set aside and the assessee's cross-objection ground allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
