Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
81 to 100 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allows the appeal, sets aside the CIT(E)'s order rejecting application under s.80G(5), and directs reconsideration of the application afresh. The Tribunal held the assessee's dominant and actual activities are charitable, the allegedly religious object was neither acted upon nor financed, and registration under s.12AB(1)(b) confirms charitable status; consequently denial of s.80G approval on that sole ground was inconsistent. ITAT construed s.80G(5B) as permitting de minimis expenditure on religious activities (subject to its threshold) and required verification of actual expenditure before refusal. Matter is remitted to the CIT(E) for fresh decision consistent with these principles; appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
ITAT allows the appeal, sets aside the CIT(E)'s order rejecting application under s.80G(5), and directs reconsideration of the application afresh. The Tribunal held the assessee's dominant and actual activities are charitable, the allegedly religious object was neither acted upon nor financed, and registration under s.12AB(1)(b) confirms charitable status; consequently denial of s.80G approval on that sole ground was inconsistent. ITAT construed s.80G(5B) as permitting de minimis expenditure on religious activities (subject to its threshold) and required verification of actual expenditure before refusal. Matter is remitted to the CIT(E) for fresh decision consistent with these principles; appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.