Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
81 to 100 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed the petition and upheld the Respondent-Bank's June 13, 2025 order classifying the petitioner's account as "fraud" and reporting the petitioner to the regulator. The court found the impugned order to be reasoned, complied with the doctrine of audi alteram partem and the Master Directions (2024) requirement for issuance of a detailed show-cause notice furnishing the basis for fraud classification. The petitioner, a promoter/controller of the corporate borrower, was held liable for acts and omissions of the company; non-executive directors' roles were distinguished and exonerated. Absent any procedural infirmity or breach of natural-justice norms, the challenge to the fraud classification and reporting was rejected.
The HC dismissed the petition and upheld the Respondent-Bank's June 13, 2025 order classifying the petitioner's account as "fraud" and reporting the petitioner to the regulator. The court found the impugned order to be reasoned, complied with the doctrine of audi alteram partem and the Master Directions (2024) requirement for issuance of a detailed show-cause notice furnishing the basis for fraud classification. The petitioner, a promoter/controller of the corporate borrower, was held liable for acts and omissions of the company; non-executive directors' roles were distinguished and exonerated. Absent any procedural infirmity or breach of natural-justice norms, the challenge to the fraud classification and reporting was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
