Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that amounts credited by the employer company constituted salary and not deemed dividend under s. 2(22)(e), and therefore no addition was warranted; the tribunal accepted the assessee's filed return and computation as evidence of salary receipt. The tribunal further held that additions under s. 68 (and s. 69A) for unexplained cash credits were unjustified where the assessee adduced an explanation and the AO failed to discharge the evidentiary burden to the contrary, and accordingly deleted those additions. Net result: all contested additions were deleted and the appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that amounts credited by the employer company constituted salary and not deemed dividend under s. 2(22)(e), and therefore no addition was warranted; the tribunal accepted the assessee's filed return and computation as evidence of salary receipt. The tribunal further held that additions under s. 68 (and s. 69A) for unexplained cash credits were unjustified where the assessee adduced an explanation and the AO failed to discharge the evidentiary burden to the contrary, and accordingly deleted those additions. Net result: all contested additions were deleted and the appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
