Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10041 to 10060 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that amounts credited by the employer company constituted salary and not deemed dividend under s. 2(22)(e), and therefore no addition was warranted; the tribunal accepted the assessee's filed return and computation as evidence of salary receipt. The tribunal further held that additions under s. 68 (and s. 69A) for unexplained cash credits were unjustified where the assessee adduced an explanation and the AO failed to discharge the evidentiary burden to the contrary, and accordingly deleted those additions. Net result: all contested additions were deleted and the appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that amounts credited by the employer company constituted salary and not deemed dividend under s. 2(22)(e), and therefore no addition was warranted; the tribunal accepted the assessee's filed return and computation as evidence of salary receipt. The tribunal further held that additions under s. 68 (and s. 69A) for unexplained cash credits were unjustified where the assessee adduced an explanation and the AO failed to discharge the evidentiary burden to the contrary, and accordingly deleted those additions. Net result: all contested additions were deleted and the appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
