Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
The HC held the writ petition not maintainable insofar as it challenges an appealable order and where an alternative remedy is available; factual determinations concerning classification of supplies (composite v. mixed supply and applicable tax rate for reagent with equipment) must be determined by the Appellate Authority. The petitioner is relegated to pursue the statutory remedy under Section 107 of the CGST Act and directed to file the appeal with requisite pre-deposit by 15 November 2025; if so filed within that period the appeal will be heard on its merits and will not be dismissed for delay. The petition is disposed of.
The HC held the writ petition not maintainable insofar as it challenges an appealable order and where an alternative remedy is available; factual determinations concerning classification of supplies (composite v. mixed supply and applicable tax rate for reagent with equipment) must be determined by the Appellate Authority. The petitioner is relegated to pursue the statutory remedy under Section 107 of the CGST Act and directed to file the appeal with requisite pre-deposit by 15 November 2025; if so filed within that period the appeal will be heard on its merits and will not be dismissed for delay. The petition is disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
