Reassessment under s.148A held valid; s.69 additions totaling Rs.7,00,000 deleted after acceptable contemporaneous explanations for property investmen...
Adjudication set aside; Rule 9 valuation based on internet engineer report quashed for Rule 3(4) non-compliance; Section 138B cross-examination requir...
HC disposed the writ petition and remitted the matter to the Respondent for a de novo adjudication, holding the appeal was filed beyond the condonable limitation and the Applicant failed to file a reply. Conditioned on the Applicant depositing 40% of the disputed tax in cash through the Electronic Cash Register within 30 days of service of this order and filing a consolidated reply to the show-cause notice in GST DRC-01 dated 14.08.2023 treating the impugned order of 30.12.2023 as an addendum within the same 30-day period, the Respondent is directed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within three months.
HC disposed the writ petition and remitted the matter to the Respondent for a de novo adjudication, holding the appeal was filed beyond the condonable limitation and the Applicant failed to file a reply. Conditioned on the Applicant depositing 40% of the disputed tax in cash through the Electronic Cash Register within 30 days of service of this order and filing a consolidated reply to the show-cause notice in GST DRC-01 dated 14.08.2023 treating the impugned order of 30.12.2023 as an addendum within the same 30-day period, the Respondent is directed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within three months.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
