Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Page of 4823
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3381 to 3400 of 96456 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC disposed the writ petition and remitted the matter to the Respondent for a de novo adjudication, holding the appeal was filed beyond the condonable limitation and the Applicant failed to file a reply. Conditioned on the Applicant depositing 40% of the disputed tax in cash through the Electronic Cash Register within 30 days of service of this order and filing a consolidated reply to the show-cause notice in GST DRC-01 dated 14.08.2023 treating the impugned order of 30.12.2023 as an addendum within the same 30-day period, the Respondent is directed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within three months.
HC disposed the writ petition and remitted the matter to the Respondent for a de novo adjudication, holding the appeal was filed beyond the condonable limitation and the Applicant failed to file a reply. Conditioned on the Applicant depositing 40% of the disputed tax in cash through the Electronic Cash Register within 30 days of service of this order and filing a consolidated reply to the show-cause notice in GST DRC-01 dated 14.08.2023 treating the impugned order of 30.12.2023 as an addendum within the same 30-day period, the Respondent is directed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within three months.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
