Prospective valuation amendment limits reassessment: unamended fair market value reference could not justify reopening based on a registered valuer's ...
Exemption for examination-related services rejected where recipients were commercial entities; suppression sustained extended limitation and penalties...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1501 to 1520 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC quashed the impugned assessment order dated 16.02.2024 and remitted the matter to the 2nd Respondent for fresh adjudication after observing that the Petitioner failed to respond to the SCN dated 30.12.2023 and subsequent notices. Consistent with precedent, remand is conditioned upon the Petitioner's additional pre-deposit of 15% of the disputed tax in cash from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register/Electronic Credit Ledger, over and above the 10% already deposited before the Appellate Authority, such that total pre-deposit equals 25%. The 15% cash deposit must be made within 30 days of receipt of this order. Petition disposed by way of remand.
The HC quashed the impugned assessment order dated 16.02.2024 and remitted the matter to the 2nd Respondent for fresh adjudication after observing that the Petitioner failed to respond to the SCN dated 30.12.2023 and subsequent notices. Consistent with precedent, remand is conditioned upon the Petitioner's additional pre-deposit of 15% of the disputed tax in cash from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register/Electronic Credit Ledger, over and above the 10% already deposited before the Appellate Authority, such that total pre-deposit equals 25%. The 15% cash deposit must be made within 30 days of receipt of this order. Petition disposed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
