Reassessment under s.148A held valid; s.69 additions totaling Rs.7,00,000 deleted after acceptable contemporaneous explanations for property investmen...
Adjudication set aside; Rule 9 valuation based on internet engineer report quashed for Rule 3(4) non-compliance; Section 138B cross-examination requir...
The HC disposed of the writ petition challenging a bank attachment notice issued under the GST enactments and directed the Respondents to treat the impugned notice as a notice to show cause why penalty, tax and interest should not be recovered from the Petitioner. The Petitioner was permitted to file a detailed representation within 30 days of receipt of the order. The 1st Respondent or any authorized officer was directed to adjudicate the representation and pass a reasoned order on merits and in accordance with law within two months thereafter. The petition is disposed of accordingly.
The HC disposed of the writ petition challenging a bank attachment notice issued under the GST enactments and directed the Respondents to treat the impugned notice as a notice to show cause why penalty, tax and interest should not be recovered from the Petitioner. The Petitioner was permitted to file a detailed representation within 30 days of receipt of the order. The 1st Respondent or any authorized officer was directed to adjudicate the representation and pass a reasoned order on merits and in accordance with law within two months thereafter. The petition is disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
