Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
The HC disposed of the writ petition challenging a bank attachment notice issued under the GST enactments and directed the Respondents to treat the impugned notice as a notice to show cause why penalty, tax and interest should not be recovered from the Petitioner. The Petitioner was permitted to file a detailed representation within 30 days of receipt of the order. The 1st Respondent or any authorized officer was directed to adjudicate the representation and pass a reasoned order on merits and in accordance with law within two months thereafter. The petition is disposed of accordingly.
The HC disposed of the writ petition challenging a bank attachment notice issued under the GST enactments and directed the Respondents to treat the impugned notice as a notice to show cause why penalty, tax and interest should not be recovered from the Petitioner. The Petitioner was permitted to file a detailed representation within 30 days of receipt of the order. The 1st Respondent or any authorized officer was directed to adjudicate the representation and pass a reasoned order on merits and in accordance with law within two months thereafter. The petition is disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
