Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC disposed of the writ petition challenging a bank attachment notice issued under the GST enactments and directed the Respondents to treat the impugned notice as a notice to show cause why penalty, tax and interest should not be recovered from the Petitioner. The Petitioner was permitted to file a detailed representation within 30 days of receipt of the order. The 1st Respondent or any authorized officer was directed to adjudicate the representation and pass a reasoned order on merits and in accordance with law within two months thereafter. The petition is disposed of accordingly.
The HC disposed of the writ petition challenging a bank attachment notice issued under the GST enactments and directed the Respondents to treat the impugned notice as a notice to show cause why penalty, tax and interest should not be recovered from the Petitioner. The Petitioner was permitted to file a detailed representation within 30 days of receipt of the order. The 1st Respondent or any authorized officer was directed to adjudicate the representation and pass a reasoned order on merits and in accordance with law within two months thereafter. The petition is disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
