Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
The HC disposed of the writ petition challenging a bank attachment notice issued under the GST enactments and directed the Respondents to treat the impugned notice as a notice to show cause why penalty, tax and interest should not be recovered from the Petitioner. The Petitioner was permitted to file a detailed representation within 30 days of receipt of the order. The 1st Respondent or any authorized officer was directed to adjudicate the representation and pass a reasoned order on merits and in accordance with law within two months thereafter. The petition is disposed of accordingly.
The HC disposed of the writ petition challenging a bank attachment notice issued under the GST enactments and directed the Respondents to treat the impugned notice as a notice to show cause why penalty, tax and interest should not be recovered from the Petitioner. The Petitioner was permitted to file a detailed representation within 30 days of receipt of the order. The 1st Respondent or any authorized officer was directed to adjudicate the representation and pass a reasoned order on merits and in accordance with law within two months thereafter. The petition is disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
