Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10041 to 10060 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Petitioner (an anonymized corporate assessee) moved the HC challenging territorial jurisdiction and validity of reopening under s.148 of the IT Act read with the extended limitation provisions under TOLA; the Court held that, following relocation of the Petitioner's registered office to Mumbai and substantial events arising within the HC's territory, a substantial part of the cause of action arose within the HC's jurisdiction under Art.226(2), rejecting the forum conveniens objection. Applying binding precedent, the HC set aside the impugned s.148 notice and all consequential proceedings, thereby quashing the reopening and terminating the assessment action initiated pursuant to that notice.
The Petitioner (an anonymized corporate assessee) moved the HC challenging territorial jurisdiction and validity of reopening under s.148 of the IT Act read with the extended limitation provisions under TOLA; the Court held that, following relocation of the Petitioner's registered office to Mumbai and substantial events arising within the HC's territory, a substantial part of the cause of action arose within the HC's jurisdiction under Art.226(2), rejecting the forum conveniens objection. Applying binding precedent, the HC set aside the impugned s.148 notice and all consequential proceedings, thereby quashing the reopening and terminating the assessment action initiated pursuant to that notice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
