Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal and upheld the CIT(A)'s deletions. The Tribunal followed a co-ordinate bench's decision in the assessee's own case for a prior year and declined to disturb the deletion of additions attributable to a purported bogus unsecured loan and any commission allegedly paid to procure it. Consequently, Revenue's Grounds 1 and 2 were dismissed. With respect to additions under section 41(1), the Tribunal accepted the assessee's retraction of the survey statement, found that the field enquiry did not comply with mandated procedural safeguards and lacked independent corroboration, and directed the AO to delete the entire section 41(1) addition. The appeals were thereby decided in favour of the assessee.
ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal and upheld the CIT(A)'s deletions. The Tribunal followed a co-ordinate bench's decision in the assessee's own case for a prior year and declined to disturb the deletion of additions attributable to a purported bogus unsecured loan and any commission allegedly paid to procure it. Consequently, Revenue's Grounds 1 and 2 were dismissed. With respect to additions under section 41(1), the Tribunal accepted the assessee's retraction of the survey statement, found that the field enquiry did not comply with mandated procedural safeguards and lacked independent corroboration, and directed the AO to delete the entire section 41(1) addition. The appeals were thereby decided in favour of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
