Petition dismissed; petitioner allowed to submit detailed disclosures and documents for re-consideration; notices for 2019-23 may be adjudicated on me...
Confiscation and duty recovery quashed where licensing records show export obligation discharged; customs lacks jurisdiction absent licence annulment ...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10141 to 10160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the appeal, holding the notice issued under section 263 to be void ab initio. Applying the apex-court principle that jurisdiction under s.263 arises only where the assessing officer's order is both erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue, the Tribunal found the prerequisite lacking. The AO had issued multiple notices under s.142(1) and the assessee furnished substantiating material evidencing carry-forward losses on share disposals and claiming long-term capital gains exemption under the applicable DTAA. In view of those disclosures and the absence of prejudice to the income-tax administration, the s.263 action could not be sustained and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
ITAT allowed the appeal, holding the notice issued under section 263 to be void ab initio. Applying the apex-court principle that jurisdiction under s.263 arises only where the assessing officer's order is both erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue, the Tribunal found the prerequisite lacking. The AO had issued multiple notices under s.142(1) and the assessee furnished substantiating material evidencing carry-forward losses on share disposals and claiming long-term capital gains exemption under the applicable DTAA. In view of those disclosures and the absence of prejudice to the income-tax administration, the s.263 action could not be sustained and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.