Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC accepted the Petitioner's undertaking that the cumulative funds in the attached bank accounts (approximately Rs. 10,00,000) will not be withdrawn or otherwise dealt with and treated counsel's statement as a binding undertaking to the Court; the undertaking must be strictly complied with. The Court observed that continued attachment would cause disproportionate prejudice by preventing receipt and use of remittances for operational needs (e.g., employee payments) without benefit to the Respondent. Having recorded and accepted the undertaking, the HC disposed of the petition on that basis, subject to enforcement of the undertaking and any future application for variation or recall.
The HC accepted the Petitioner's undertaking that the cumulative funds in the attached bank accounts (approximately Rs. 10,00,000) will not be withdrawn or otherwise dealt with and treated counsel's statement as a binding undertaking to the Court; the undertaking must be strictly complied with. The Court observed that continued attachment would cause disproportionate prejudice by preventing receipt and use of remittances for operational needs (e.g., employee payments) without benefit to the Respondent. Having recorded and accepted the undertaking, the HC disposed of the petition on that basis, subject to enforcement of the undertaking and any future application for variation or recall.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
