Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10041 to 10060 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
SC dismissed the appeal, affirming the High Court's dismissal of Revenue's challenge to the reopening of assessment. The SC held that directions to place on record the reasons to believe and the original order under s.143(3) were intended to test correctness of the CIT and Tribunal findings; Revenue's inability to produce the records precluded any demonstration that those findings were perverse in relation to the objections. In consequence, absent the relevant material, the CIT's conclusions, as affirmed by the Tribunal, were not amenable to interference. Although the High Court could have refrained from observing that Revenue was uninterested in pursuing the appeal, that remark did not vitiate dismissal.
SC dismissed the appeal, affirming the High Court's dismissal of Revenue's challenge to the reopening of assessment. The SC held that directions to place on record the reasons to believe and the original order under s.143(3) were intended to test correctness of the CIT and Tribunal findings; Revenue's inability to produce the records precluded any demonstration that those findings were perverse in relation to the objections. In consequence, absent the relevant material, the CIT's conclusions, as affirmed by the Tribunal, were not amenable to interference. Although the High Court could have refrained from observing that Revenue was uninterested in pursuing the appeal, that remark did not vitiate dismissal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.