Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC granted ad-interim relief, holding that the impugned notices and the assessment order dated 31.03.2022 are stayed and respondents, successors, subordinates and agents are restrained by injunction from taking further steps; prima facie the AO lacked jurisdiction to treat the Section 148 notice as a show-cause under Section 148A(b) or to pass an order under Section 148A(d), and no subsequent assessment has been completed. The court directed the Revenue to deposit Rs. 1,63,45,488 into court pending further orders, finding the recovery/adjustment from the petitioner prima facie impermissible and rejecting the Revenue's ITBA-based contention.
The HC granted ad-interim relief, holding that the impugned notices and the assessment order dated 31.03.2022 are stayed and respondents, successors, subordinates and agents are restrained by injunction from taking further steps; prima facie the AO lacked jurisdiction to treat the Section 148 notice as a show-cause under Section 148A(b) or to pass an order under Section 148A(d), and no subsequent assessment has been completed. The court directed the Revenue to deposit Rs. 1,63,45,488 into court pending further orders, finding the recovery/adjustment from the petitioner prima facie impermissible and rejecting the Revenue's ITBA-based contention.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
