Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10041 to 10060 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC granted ad-interim relief, holding that the impugned notices and the assessment order dated 31.03.2022 are stayed and respondents, successors, subordinates and agents are restrained by injunction from taking further steps; prima facie the AO lacked jurisdiction to treat the Section 148 notice as a show-cause under Section 148A(b) or to pass an order under Section 148A(d), and no subsequent assessment has been completed. The court directed the Revenue to deposit Rs. 1,63,45,488 into court pending further orders, finding the recovery/adjustment from the petitioner prima facie impermissible and rejecting the Revenue's ITBA-based contention.
The HC granted ad-interim relief, holding that the impugned notices and the assessment order dated 31.03.2022 are stayed and respondents, successors, subordinates and agents are restrained by injunction from taking further steps; prima facie the AO lacked jurisdiction to treat the Section 148 notice as a show-cause under Section 148A(b) or to pass an order under Section 148A(d), and no subsequent assessment has been completed. The court directed the Revenue to deposit Rs. 1,63,45,488 into court pending further orders, finding the recovery/adjustment from the petitioner prima facie impermissible and rejecting the Revenue's ITBA-based contention.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
