Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC held that, given admitted ex parte proceedings and documentary confirmation that service via email was not established due to non-communication by the taxpayer's chartered accountant and the AO's own note that the email could not be located, there remained a real doubt as to valid service of the Section 148B notice. Relying on analogous authority, the HC declined to allow the ex parte consequence to stand and granted the Petitioner one opportunity to be heard, directing the Petitioner to appear before Respondent No. 3 and furnish a substantive reply to the Section 148B notice within the time stipulated by the AO.
The HC held that, given admitted ex parte proceedings and documentary confirmation that service via email was not established due to non-communication by the taxpayer's chartered accountant and the AO's own note that the email could not be located, there remained a real doubt as to valid service of the Section 148B notice. Relying on analogous authority, the HC declined to allow the ex parte consequence to stand and granted the Petitioner one opportunity to be heard, directing the Petitioner to appear before Respondent No. 3 and furnish a substantive reply to the Section 148B notice within the time stipulated by the AO.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.