Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The HC dismissed Revenue's appeal and upheld the Tribunal's orders: it affirmed that, in light of the SC precedent, the assessee is entitled to deduction under s.80IA(4) for power generated for captive consumption and that the market value may be determined by reference to comparable State Electricity Board rates, yielding a higher deduction where profits are higher. On interest disallowances under s.36(1)(iii) and s.14A, the HC agreed with the Tribunal that the blanket 10% disallowance was impermissible where borrowed funds were not shown to finance dividend-earning investments, and sustained the Tribunal's factual disallowance of Rs.91.80 lakh; it also accepted the consensual Rs.5 lakh disallowance in respect of other administrative expenses.
The HC dismissed Revenue's appeal and upheld the Tribunal's orders: it affirmed that, in light of the SC precedent, the assessee is entitled to deduction under s.80IA(4) for power generated for captive consumption and that the market value may be determined by reference to comparable State Electricity Board rates, yielding a higher deduction where profits are higher. On interest disallowances under s.36(1)(iii) and s.14A, the HC agreed with the Tribunal that the blanket 10% disallowance was impermissible where borrowed funds were not shown to finance dividend-earning investments, and sustained the Tribunal's factual disallowance of Rs.91.80 lakh; it also accepted the consensual Rs.5 lakh disallowance in respect of other administrative expenses.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
