Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10041 to 10060 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the CIT(A)'s orders: the amount characterized as an "arbitration award" was held to be a typographical misclassification of software sale and the related addition was deleted; foreign exchange fluctuation gains were held to be business receipts directly relatable to export of software and therefore eligible for exemption under s.10A; and no disallowance under s.40(a)(ia) was warranted where the assessee had deducted tax at source (albeit at a lower rate) on the buy-back consideration, such deduction being treated as compliance with the TDS obligation. The Revenue's challenge was therefore rejected in entirety.
ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the CIT(A)'s orders: the amount characterized as an "arbitration award" was held to be a typographical misclassification of software sale and the related addition was deleted; foreign exchange fluctuation gains were held to be business receipts directly relatable to export of software and therefore eligible for exemption under s.10A; and no disallowance under s.40(a)(ia) was warranted where the assessee had deducted tax at source (albeit at a lower rate) on the buy-back consideration, such deduction being treated as compliance with the TDS obligation. The Revenue's challenge was therefore rejected in entirety.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
