Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held that interest received by the assessee on enhanced compensation consequent to compulsory acquisition does not constitute taxable income under s.56(2)(viii) read with s.145B(1); the Assessing Officer's inclusion of 50% of such interest as income was set aside. Noting divergent High Court rulings, the Tribunal, guided by prevailing Supreme Court principle favoring the assessee where conflicts exist, aligned with the decisions favorable to the assessee and allowed the appeal. Assessment treating the disputed interest as income was therefore reversed and the matter remitted/treated in accordance with this determination.
ITAT held that interest received by the assessee on enhanced compensation consequent to compulsory acquisition does not constitute taxable income under s.56(2)(viii) read with s.145B(1); the Assessing Officer's inclusion of 50% of such interest as income was set aside. Noting divergent High Court rulings, the Tribunal, guided by prevailing Supreme Court principle favoring the assessee where conflicts exist, aligned with the decisions favorable to the assessee and allowed the appeal. Assessment treating the disputed interest as income was therefore reversed and the matter remitted/treated in accordance with this determination.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.