Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT directed the AO to give effect to his own order under s.143(3) and vacate that portion of the demand raised under s.141(1)(a) attributable to disallowance of gratuity provision under s.40A(7), allowing Ground No.1 of the appeal and thereby reducing the demand in favour of the assessee. With respect to delayed employer/employee welfare contributions, the Tribunal noted the amendment to s.143(1)(a) by the Finance Act, 2016 and, having regard to the SC precedent, held that an AO is competent to effect disallowances while processing the return under s.143(1)(a) where the audit report indicates such liability; the CIT(A)'s observations and prior ITAT view supporting this position were endorsed.
ITAT directed the AO to give effect to his own order under s.143(3) and vacate that portion of the demand raised under s.141(1)(a) attributable to disallowance of gratuity provision under s.40A(7), allowing Ground No.1 of the appeal and thereby reducing the demand in favour of the assessee. With respect to delayed employer/employee welfare contributions, the Tribunal noted the amendment to s.143(1)(a) by the Finance Act, 2016 and, having regard to the SC precedent, held that an AO is competent to effect disallowances while processing the return under s.143(1)(a) where the audit report indicates such liability; the CIT(A)'s observations and prior ITAT view supporting this position were endorsed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.