Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10041 to 10060 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT directed the AO to give effect to his own order under s.143(3) and vacate that portion of the demand raised under s.141(1)(a) attributable to disallowance of gratuity provision under s.40A(7), allowing Ground No.1 of the appeal and thereby reducing the demand in favour of the assessee. With respect to delayed employer/employee welfare contributions, the Tribunal noted the amendment to s.143(1)(a) by the Finance Act, 2016 and, having regard to the SC precedent, held that an AO is competent to effect disallowances while processing the return under s.143(1)(a) where the audit report indicates such liability; the CIT(A)'s observations and prior ITAT view supporting this position were endorsed.
ITAT directed the AO to give effect to his own order under s.143(3) and vacate that portion of the demand raised under s.141(1)(a) attributable to disallowance of gratuity provision under s.40A(7), allowing Ground No.1 of the appeal and thereby reducing the demand in favour of the assessee. With respect to delayed employer/employee welfare contributions, the Tribunal noted the amendment to s.143(1)(a) by the Finance Act, 2016 and, having regard to the SC precedent, held that an AO is competent to effect disallowances while processing the return under s.143(1)(a) where the audit report indicates such liability; the CIT(A)'s observations and prior ITAT view supporting this position were endorsed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
