All appeals dismissed; finding of anti-competitive bid-rigging upheld under Sections 3(3)(c), 3(3)(d) read with 3(1); cease-and-desist and total-turno...
Central Government notifies 11.541-hectare Special Economic Zone for semiconductor manufacturing; Approval Committee constituted, ICD status effective...
Government appoints National Customs Targeting Centre-Passenger director as customs officer with powers under PNR Regulations, 2022 and Sections 30A, ...
The HC dismissed the challenge insofar as relief for striking down the impugned clarification dated 25 September 2020 has already been worked out by earlier batch litigation; consequently, while adjudicating the Petitioners' duty-drawback claims the Respondents are barred from relying upon the impugned clarification. The court directed that reliance on that clarification would prima facie constitute impermissible judicial indiscipline and must not be engaged in. In view of the foregoing, the petition is disposed of, with the operative consequence that duty-drawback processing shall proceed without reference to the 25 September 2020 clarification and subject to existing law and the earlier judicial pronouncement.
The HC dismissed the challenge insofar as relief for striking down the impugned clarification dated 25 September 2020 has already been worked out by earlier batch litigation; consequently, while adjudicating the Petitioners' duty-drawback claims the Respondents are barred from relying upon the impugned clarification. The court directed that reliance on that clarification would prima facie constitute impermissible judicial indiscipline and must not be engaged in. In view of the foregoing, the petition is disposed of, with the operative consequence that duty-drawback processing shall proceed without reference to the 25 September 2020 clarification and subject to existing law and the earlier judicial pronouncement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
