Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10041 to 10060 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that the question whether the recipients of the petitioner's manpower services fall within the exemptions under the impugned notifications must be determined on facts and by reference to the status of each recipient, and is for the Appellate Authority to decide. Noting that the petitioner has not collected GST from its clients and given the factual nature of the dispute, the HC permitted the petitioner to file an appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act by 10 July 2025. The Appellate Authority is directed to consider the factual issues and to determine the quantum of any pre-deposit payable. Petition disposed.
The HC held that the question whether the recipients of the petitioner's manpower services fall within the exemptions under the impugned notifications must be determined on facts and by reference to the status of each recipient, and is for the Appellate Authority to decide. Noting that the petitioner has not collected GST from its clients and given the factual nature of the dispute, the HC permitted the petitioner to file an appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act by 10 July 2025. The Appellate Authority is directed to consider the factual issues and to determine the quantum of any pre-deposit payable. Petition disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
