Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
AAAR affirmed that the appellant is not entitled to avoid reversal of input tax credit (ITC) on common inputs and input services relating to mutual fund subscription and redemption, holding that the deeming provision in section 17(3) incorporates "transactions in securities" into the value of exempt supplies for ITC reversal. The authority rejected the contention that "securities" exclusion from goods/services removes them from exempt/non-taxable supply treatment and construed the Rule reference to "sale value" consistently with "transactions in securities," encompassing redemptions. The AAAR also found no substantiation that subscription/redemption activities were in the course or furtherance of the appellant's business. The appeal is dismissed.
AAAR affirmed that the appellant is not entitled to avoid reversal of input tax credit (ITC) on common inputs and input services relating to mutual fund subscription and redemption, holding that the deeming provision in section 17(3) incorporates "transactions in securities" into the value of exempt supplies for ITC reversal. The authority rejected the contention that "securities" exclusion from goods/services removes them from exempt/non-taxable supply treatment and construed the Rule reference to "sale value" consistently with "transactions in securities," encompassing redemptions. The AAAR also found no substantiation that subscription/redemption activities were in the course or furtherance of the appellant's business. The appeal is dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
